top of page

Weekly Essay 4-6

If you are reading this right now, may I ask you a question, are you an iPhone user? How many of your other classmates (or friends) are using an iPhone too? Is there any particular reason “why” you are using an iPhone and not an Android, or Windows phone even when they are more affordable? Would you agree that if I say this is because your experience with any Apple products has usually been a good one? Well, according to Tim Brown, this is because Apple, the most valuable company in the world places design at the center of everything it does; Apple applies design thinking to create value, or delight among its customers. And this led us to our reading this week assigned by our guest speaker Laurel Syah, which is the book “Change by Design” by Tim Brown. 

The book introduced us to the design thinking process, which Tim Brown described as a methodology to solve a problem by putting people’s need and desire first that is technologically feasible and strategically viable. He encouraged us to solve design problem by focusing on human behavior through empathy and observation (known as the human-centered design approach), asking “Why?” and the “How might we” to create value in the solution. So, how would design thinking applicable for you? To apply design thinking, one should start with divergent to gather ideas, and narrow the possible solutions down through convergent with the constraint of the triple bottom line: people, planet and profit. He emphasized that you cannot just have the ability to apply design thinking, it is important that you understand how to execute your idea well too. In an organization setting, a leader should start with design thinking application first, and then imply the design thinking culture within the company in order to create a sustainable business model. Last semester, I had the privilege to be in the same group with Priyama, Giovana and Nadia for the IDEO Human-Centered Design course and it is the best group experience I have ever had. I didn’t just learn about design thinking and Human-Centered Design process from the course, I have learned how to collaborate with people from other discipline in solving a design problem. 

After reading the book, I was curious to then find out more about “The Shop” in which our speaker Laurel Syah is serving as Head Creative. When I was browsing through the website, the three words that caught my attention most are the insights, ideation, and implementation, which is exactly the process for the human-centered design. The Shop is actually a living experience of the book and surprisingly it is not part of IDEO! In these present environment in which everything is constantly changing, more and more companies actually started applying design thinking in their culture to achieve a sustainable business model. In a Harvard Business Review article this August titled “When Everyone Is Doing Design Thinking, Is It Still a Competitive Advantage?” by Tim Brown, he stated that design thinking is a skill, a mastery that required lifelong learning and practices, a set of tools that grow old with us. The reading doesn’t just teach us about design thinking, it teaches us to design life. I sincerely hope that every one of us in this class after reading the book, will use what you have learned as a catalyst, to be the drivers of change in the society. We shouldn’t just see our daily problems as just an ordinary problem, but see it as a design problem that we can tackle, and come out with a solution that will create delight and also beneficial to the triple bottom line.

Cheryl D. Miller, a Clergywoman, Theologian, Communications Designer and Author, guest speaker this week, has provided us with six PDF readings. These six readings focus on two themes: the lack of African American graphic designers and also importance of embracing diversity in graphic design. It is fascinating to see importance of diversity in the design industry has been consistent throughout the six readings from 1987 to 2015. The readings suggested lack of opportunities and exposure in minority group that resulted the dominance of White in graphic design industry. 

One of my personal experiences similar to the readings was in my undergraduate (model making). I was the only non-Whites in class. I was feeling overwhelmed at the beginning and under-privileged as I never have the opportunity to operate any shop machines before which most Americans did in middle/high school. I don’t have a mentor to look upon and design is not a common field of study in Malaysia. I understand then that I will need to put in the extra efforts to be successful. However, things are different when I enrolled into the Design Management program. 

The Design Management program at SASD, is an ideal program in advocating and embracing diversity. There are total of 13 students from 7 different countries, ranging from graphic, interior, and industrial design, model making, media and marketing. One example similar to what we do is the d. school in Stamford University that collaborating people from different discipline and background to solve design problems. We, the design management students are there to break the stereotypes and believe that everyone can be a designer. To quote AIGA Diversity & Inclusion, I believe it is important to “encouraging diversity in design education, discourse, and practice to strengthen and expand the relevance of design in all areas of society”.

“Does the advertisement project a proposition? Is it unique? And will it sell?” This statement is one of the important lessons known as “Unique Selling Proposition (USP)” from the reading “Reality in Advertising”, written by advertising pioneer Rosser Reeves in 1961. I found that it was rather interesting that our guest speaker, Adam Kaplan, being an Executive Creative Director with vast creativity experiences, provided us with a book that has a chapter specifically talked about how “originality” is the most dangerous word for advertisement. This contradicted another book “Ogilvy on Advertising” published in 1983 that some of us read last semester, in which another advertising legend David Ogilvy said “If it doesn’t sell, it isn’t creative.” So what is the reality of advertising? Is it to be creative or not to be creative? 

According to the author, advertising is a tool to convey ideas and information about a product. To do that successfully, he said that one should understand the effectiveness of their advertisement and also understanding the unpredictable human nature in which there is no guaranteed success method. One recent example is the simplistic Starbucks red cup design which was designed to signify the coming of holiday season so that customer can create their own holiday stories. But instead, it created a big controversy as some people take it as anti-Christians just because it doesn’t say Merry Christmas on the cup. 

To design means to plan. As a designer, you cannot design an advertisement, products or even services if it doesn’t serve its purpose in communicating what you tried to express to the audiences/users. To quote Davild Ogilvy again, “The consumer isn’t a moron. She is your wife.” Even when the outcome is unpredictable, but being a designer, what you should do is do the research, able to empathize to audiences/users’ needs, and then uses your creativity to convey the intended message (USP) to your audiences in the most effective way.

The class weekly essay based on the guest speaker's reading for this semester:
bottom of page